I am Ali Gürtuna, the founder of AGProLabs. I maintain the analytical tools and reading guides collected below. This is an owner-maintained route through those resources, prepared with AI assistance.
Begin with one answerable question
A useful chart-reading session begins before the first indicator is added. Write down what you want to examine: a screening result, a channel reference, the timing of an alert, or the difference between two ways of organizing the same market. That sentence gives the session a boundary. It also gives you a way to decide which documentation deserves your attention first.
Keep the question small enough to revisit. “What does this dashboard field mean?” is easier to investigate than “Which tool should I use for everything?” Save the relevant guide beside your question. When another interesting topic appears, put it in a later-reading list. You can then finish one line of inquiry without losing the next one.
Describe the workspace before comparing outputs
Give your notes a short header: instrument, exchange or data source, chart type, timeframe, observation time, and the tool configuration you are reviewing. Use the same header when you repeat the exercise. A screenshot becomes much more useful when someone can tell what was on screen and when it was captured.
The first catalogue section supports this preparation. It separates watchlist construction, market selection, workspace organization, and tool comparison. Read those pages as documentation for setting up a study session. When comparing tools, record the analytical job each one describes and the information each produces. A product name by itself is a poor substitute for that written description.
Make time and measurement explicit
Before interpreting a value, look for its unit, reference period, and update condition. Put those details in your notes using the source's terminology. If the documentation leaves something unclear, preserve the question rather than filling the gap with an assumption. The catalogue includes dedicated starting points for candle timing, chart representation, volatility comparisons, relative volume, and sample size.
Use a two-column observation record. In one column, copy the field name or state label exactly as shown. In the other, write your own explanation of what you think it means. Revisit the source and check whether your explanation has become broader than the documented scope. This is especially useful when a familiar word appears in several tools with different settings.
Read structure as a sequence of references
For a channel or mapped area, describe what you can identify on the chart before drawing a conclusion. Name the reference, locate the current observation relative to it, and record the surrounding context. A short sentence tied to a visible feature is easier to review later than a confident label with no accompanying explanation.
The structure section groups channel construction, position, distance, quality fields, and changes in reference roles. It also includes a documented daily chart-review route. You do not need to read every page in one sitting. Choose the page that answers your present question, make one annotated example, and return to the catalogue when the next question becomes specific.
Keep an interpretation beside its unresolved questions
Disagreement is a useful reason to slow the reading process. Record which outputs differ, the configuration used for each, and the question you expected both to answer. The interpretation section provides reading routes for conflicting scores, different setup descriptions, location-based references, invalidation language, and relationships between observations.
Separate the recorded output, your interpretation, and any action you later consider into distinct entries. This keeps a change in your opinion from silently rewriting the original observation. These guides support documentation and analytical reading. They do not establish a prediction, an execution instruction, or a promised trading outcome; trading decisions and their risks remain with the reader.
Close with a record you can repeat
End the session by saving one question, one configuration, one timestamped example, and one unresolved issue. When reviewing a later observation, begin with that saved record. Note any configuration change before comparing the two examples. A useful comparison should leave enough detail for your future self to understand what was actually reviewed.
The final catalogue section brings together dashboard reading, alert setup, forward observation, replay review, and warnings about drawing overly broad conclusions from a particular configuration. Use the annotations to choose a starting point. They describe why a page belongs on this reading shelf; the linked page remains the place to check its current details and limitations.
Annotated Source Catalogue
The annotations identify a reading purpose. Consult the linked source for its current details and context.
Prepare the workspace
- Screen Stocks and ETFs — Start with the screening basket and record what makes its instruments suitable for comparison.
- Choose an Analytical Tool — Organize a tool comparison around its documented purpose, outputs, limitations, and access requirements.
- Indicator and Strategy Roles — Check the page terminology before comparing two tools that describe different analytical jobs.
- Browse the Tool Collections — Use the catalogue as a navigation starting point, then read the individual documentation that matches your question.
- Build a Crypto Watchlist — Write the selection rules for the basket before comparing any screening observations.
- Organize an Analysis Workspace — Keep workspace configuration details close to the question and examples being reviewed.
- Compare an ETF Watchlist — Check the comparison setup and document the basket used for the reading session.
- Compare Two AGProLabs Workflows — Identify the documented analytical role of each tool before comparing their displayed information.
- Spot and Perpetual Screening Context — Record the instrument type and data context as part of the screening setup.
- Currency and Session Checks — Keep market, session, and currency details beside any cross-market screening comparison.
- Gold Instrument Context — Check which instrument category the guide discusses before comparing examples across markets.
Review a repeatable session
- Read the Setup Planner Dashboard — Use the field-reading guide beside your own record of the dashboard state and observation time.
- Configure Indicator Alerts — Read the setup instructions and note the exact event and configuration you intend to observe.
- Forward Observation — Keep the guide beside a configuration record created before the observation you later review.
- Write a Repeatable Analysis Framework — Use the framework as a prompt to organize questions, observations, and later review notes.
- Review Configuration-Specific Conclusions — Use the warning-sign discussion to examine how broadly your recorded example can be interpreted.
- Review Chart Replay Records — Keep the information available at observation time distinguishable from what you learn during later review.
Describe channel structure
- Read Channel References — Locate the documented support and resistance references before writing your interpretation of their context.
- A Daily Chart-Review Workflow — Follow the documented review order and keep a brief record of each completed observation.
- Changes in Channel Reference Roles — Review the terminology for a changed reference and attach your own timestamped chart example.
- Channel Breakout and Retest Review — Use the checklist to document the sequence and context you are examining.
- Position Within a Channel — Check the field definition and record which channel reference your observation uses.
- Read a Channel Quality Field — Use the explanation to keep a score label separate from the conclusion you draw from it.
- Channel Distance in ATR Terms — Record the documented distance convention beside the chart reference you are reviewing.
- Dynamic Channels and Manual References — Compare the documented construction approaches and preserve the settings used for your example.
- Read Dynamic Price-Channel Structure — Follow the guide through its named references and write one observation for each relevant element.
- Internal and External Channel References — Check which reference set each label names and keep those observations distinct in your notes.
Check time and measurement
- Confirmed Candles and Repainting — Read the timing terminology before comparing a saved chart observation with a later screen.
- Relative Volume and Liquidity — Use this distinction as a prompt to record the field name, reference period, and question being examined.
- Volatility Comparison with ATR Percent — Record the documented unit and comparison context when reviewing this screening field.
- Follow Rates and Sample Size — Record the stated sample and measurement definition before interpreting the displayed rate.
- Chart Representation Checks — Record the candle representation shown in each saved example before reviewing differences.
Keep interpretations traceable
- Different Setup Descriptions — Use the named setup categories to organize questions for closer reading and comparison.
- Relationships Between Observations — Use the guide to frame questions about related positions without assuming independent evidence.
- Read a Gap in Context — Start with the page description of location and scope before attaching meaning to a marked area.
- A Score Beside a Blocked State — Read the state explanation instead of treating an isolated score as a complete interpretation.
- Investigate Indicator Disagreement — List the outputs, settings, and questions involved before trying to explain their disagreement.
- Separate Invalidation and Stop-Loss Terms — Read the definitions carefully and record the different jobs named by the page.
- Compare Sweep and Breakout Descriptions — Use the review framework to describe the observed sequence before assigning it a category.
- Conflicting Directional Scores — Record both states and their configurations when reviewing an apparently conflicting screening result.
Reading-route extension — 23 October 2026
The original session guide and its forty references remain above. This extension adds another route into the documentation: start with the unresolved question in your notes, then read the small group that addresses it. It broadens the catalogue without requiring a longer session. One precise question, one clearly labelled example and one open issue are still a useful stopping point.
The annotations below describe why a page belongs in a reading group. They are not a substitute for its current text, a claim that every linked method has been tested here, or a recommendation to buy a product. The catalogue is maintained by the owner of the linked site and prepared with AI assistance.
Choose a route before choosing another tool
When a review becomes difficult, adding another indicator can postpone the question rather than clarify it. First decide what kind of help is missing: a broad process, a comparison of tool roles, a cost check, or an adaptation to your available time. The references below provide different entrances to that conversation. Use the general index to locate a topic; use a narrower page when you can state the question it needs to answer.
- TradingView & Market Analysis Insights — Browse the topic index when the question is still broad; then select a particular explanation instead of treating the index as an instruction.
- How Rules-Based TradingView Analysis Workflows Organize Market Context — Write the stages of your review in order, then use the guide to check how a rule-based workflow separates those jobs.
- TradingView Technical Analysis: A Practical Workflow Guide — Compare your session outline with the documented workflow and retain the steps relevant to the observation you are actually studying.
- TradingView Tools for Traders with Limited Time — Define the time available for reading and follow-up before choosing which outputs you can realistically review and document.
- TradingView Indicators & Screeners: Choose Your AGProLabs Tool — List the analytical job you need before comparing named tools; read the current scope and output descriptions on the original page.
- TradingView Screener vs Chart Indicator — Keep a broad screening task separate from the close reading of one chart; record which stage produced each observation.
- Technical Analysis Tool Buying Checklist — Use a written checklist for scope, requirements and limitations before a purchase; the page is an owner-authored reference, not an independent endorsement.
- TradingView Indicator Costs: What to Check — Check the different access and platform requirements named in the source rather than assuming one displayed price describes the complete setup.
- Choosing a TradingView Indicator for Swing Trading — State the intended review horizon and how often you can revisit the chart before comparing the documented role of a tool.
Define the comparison universe
A watchlist needs a written boundary. Similar symbols can represent different venues, sessions or contracts, so a repeated label does not establish a comparable observation. Name the instrument source and the intended comparison group in the session header. Where a market has a specific session or contract transition, record that context before comparing screenshots. These are documentation tasks, not a request to increase activity or cover every market.
- Crypto Exchange Monitoring in TradingView: A Practical Guide — Record the venue and symbol for each example so an exchange-specific observation is not silently presented as a universal market reading.
- Build a Stock Sector Watchlist in TradingView — Describe why instruments belong in the same sector list and note the comparison group beside any later breadth observation.
- Pre-Market Stock Screening Checklist — Use the checklist to make the session boundary explicit; preserve the distinction between pre-market observations and a later chart review.
- How to Screen Commodities in TradingView — Identify the commodity instrument and data representation being reviewed before comparing it with a differently structured market.
- Oil Screening and Futures Rollover Checks — Record the contract or continuous-series context and review the source discussion of rollover before comparing observations across a transition.
- A Weekend Crypto Watchlist Review — Treat the weekend review as a dated preparation record with a defined basket, not a reason to assume weekday conditions are unchanged.
Check what the screen has actually measured
Before interpreting a rank or a blank field, establish the basket, unit, observation time and data state. An absent value is not a neutral score, and an older shortlist entry should retain its original timestamp. Move from the table to the chart with those details attached. If the documentation does not resolve a field, keep the question open rather than assigning the value a convenient interpretation.
- Read Market Breadth Inside a Selected Watchlist — Write down the selected watchlist alongside a breadth reading; the source question is about that chosen universe, not every instrument in existence.
- Turnover Thresholds and TradingView Volume Units — Check the displayed quantity and its unit before comparing thresholds or copying the same numeric setting into a different context.
- WARMUP and Missing Data in a TradingView Screener — Use the guide to distinguish a data-state question from an analytical result; preserve missing or warming-up states in your notes.
- From a Screener Shortlist to Chart Review — Carry the shortlist timestamp, symbol and screening question into the chart review, then record what the close-up can and cannot clarify.
- Stale Setups: When a Good Rank Arrives Too Late — Compare the timing of the original screening observation with the later chart instead of treating a retained rank as a current event.
Keep timing and reference roles separate
A useful chart note names the reference it describes. Add its timeframe, whether its construction depends on later information, and the observation time. When two views disagree, preserve both descriptions before trying to compress them into one label. A projected line, a nearby resistance reference and a confirmed pivot answer different questions. The following pages are starting points for reading those distinctions in the source terminology.
- Major vs Minor Price Channels — Identify which channel reference is being discussed before comparing the current observation with a differently scaled structure.
- Multi-Timeframe Analysis When Charts Disagree — Label each chart timeframe and its question separately; disagreement between views should remain visible in the review record.
- Pivot Confirmation and Channel Timing — Check the documented confirmation timing before assuming a historical reference was available at the earlier moment you are reviewing.
- Projected Channel Rails: Useful Context and Limits — Record the projected reference as contextual information and read its stated limits before describing a later reaction around it.
- A Qualified Candidate Near Resistance — Keep a screening qualification and the chart location as separate observations; one descriptive state does not resolve the other question.
- Trend vs Range: Change the Chart Review — Use the page to frame questions about market context, then describe why your current example belongs in the review you are conducting.
- VWAP vs Moving Average for Chart Context — Read the definitions and reference periods before comparing lines that organize price information through different measurements.
Separate a tool output from the decision record
Keep descriptive states beside the assumptions they do not establish. A score is an analytical output; a personal exposure choice is a different part of a decision record. A named portfolio state also needs its documented meaning preserved rather than converted into an automatic instruction. Where a comparison refers to costs, state the assumptions being reviewed and retain uncertainty. These references help identify the right reading question; they do not decide what a reader should trade.
- Position Size vs Indicator Score — Keep the indicator value and the separate exposure question in different fields; a displayed score alone is not a sizing rule.
- Portfolio Rotation and Relative Strength — Record the comparison set and observation period before interpreting a change in relative position within a portfolio review.
- How to Read Smart Swap and HOLD in Trading Suite — Check the current definitions of Smart Swap and HOLD in the source; copy the state label without turning it into an execution instruction.
- Risk Reward After Fees and Slippage — List the cost and slippage assumptions used in the example before comparing a gross description with a cost-aware review.
Review what changed, not just what looks successful
A repeatable process needs a record of changes. Preserve the version, settings and observation date before reviewing alerts, and keep the evaluation period visible when discussing outcomes. A percentage, a decline and a recovery question are different descriptions of a sample. None makes a small or selectively chosen history representative. End the review with a change log and unresolved questions so that a later comparison can begin from the same recorded facts.
- A Trading Journal Template for Screened Setups — Use the template as a prompt for recording the screening observation, later chart context and unanswered questions as separate entries.
- TradingView Alerts After a Script Update — Check the source instructions for reviewing alert configuration after a script revision; retain the version and settings in the change log.
- A Weekly Trading Process Review — Compare the review process with its written plan and record any changed rule or configuration before evaluating the next sample.
- Maximum Drawdown and Recovery in a Trading Review — Read the source definitions of decline and recovery within the stated review period instead of treating one headline value as the whole history.
- Win Rate vs Expectancy in a Trading Review — Keep the named measurements, sample boundaries and assumptions visible; a single percentage should not stand in for the complete evaluation.
Leave a clear handoff to your next session
Choose one next page because it answers a written question. Keep the original observation, your interpretation and any later decision in separate fields. Before repeating the review, note a changed symbol source, timeframe, version or setting. This catalogue supports educational and analytical reading; it does not provide a prediction, an automatic trade instruction, financial advice or a guaranteed result. Trading involves risk, and readers remain responsible for their decisions.